Use of cognitive enhancers for mild cognitive impairment: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND Elderly individuals who have memory problems without significant limitations in activities of daily living are often diagnosed as having mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Some of these individuals progress to dementia. Several cognitive enhancers (for example donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine, memantine) have been approved for use in people with Alzheimer's dementia but their use in patients with MCI is unclear. We aimed to determine the comparative effectiveness, safety, and cost of cognitive enhancers for MCI through a systematic review and network (that is, indirect comparisons) meta-analysis. DESIGN/METHODS We will include studies that examine the use of cognitive enhancers compared to placebo, supportive care, or other cognitive enhancers among patients diagnosed with MCI. Outcomes of interest include cognition and function (primary outcomes), as well as behavior, quality of life, safety, and cost (secondary outcomes). We will include all experimental studies (randomized controlled trials, quasi-randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials), quasi-experimental studies (controlled before-after, interrupted time series), and observational studies (cohort, case-control). Studies will be included regardless of publication status (that is, we will include unpublished studies), year, or language of dissemination.To identify potentially relevant material, we will search the following electronic databases from inception onwards: MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Ageline. The electronic database search will be supplemented by scanning the reference lists of included studies, searching Google and organization websites for unpublished or difficult to locate material literature, and contacting experts.Two reviewers will independently screen the studies for inclusion using the eligibility criteria established a priori and independently extract data. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for experimental and quasi-experimental studies and the Newcastle Ottawa Scale for observational epidemiology studies. Meta-analysis and network meta-analysis are planned, if the studies are deemed statistically, methodologically, and clinically homogenous. DISCUSSION Our systematic review will provide important information regarding the benefits, costs, and harms of cognitive enhancers for patients with MCI. This information can be used to assist healthcare providers, policy-makers, MCI patients and their family regarding the use of these agents. PROSPERO REGISTRY NUMBER: CRD42012002234.
منابع مشابه
Efficacy and safety of cognitive enhancers for patients with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND Cognitive enhancers, including cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine, are used to treat dementia, but their effectiveness for mild cognitive impairment is unclear. We conducted a systematic review to examine the efficacy and safety of cognitive enhancers for mild cognitive impairment. METHODS Our eligibility criteria were studies of the effects of donepezil, rivastigmine, galanta...
متن کاملP135: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Controlled Treatment Trials of Meta-Cognitive Therapy for Anxiety Disorders
To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on controlled treatment trials of meta-cognitive therapy (MCT) for anxiety disorders, studies were included if they employed controlled methodology and treated people above 18 years with anxiety disorders. Case studies (with less than 4 cases) and single case designed studies were excluded. A comprehensive literature search identified 15 trials f...
متن کاملA Systematic Review: the Structural Models of the Relationship between Achievement Goals, Cognitive and Meta- Cognitive Strategies and Academic Achievement
The aim of this study was to systematic review of the proposed structural models about the relationship between achievement goals , cognitive and metacognitive strategies and academic achievment. method: The narrative based systematic review was employed which is a type of meta- analysis methods. the statistical Population includes all studies which used structural equation models in oder to in...
متن کاملA systematic review and Qualitative meta-analysis on the Identification patterns in Specific Learning Disorder
An accurate identification serves as the pathway that can guide the therapist towards the ultimate goal of adopting appropriate therapeutic and rehabilitation methods. Therefore, the present study aimed to systematically review and qualitative meta-analysis on the identification patterns in Specific Learning Disorder (SLD). The data in this qualitative meta-analysis was all study related to key...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012